Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:14

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Google, Meta and Snap think this tech is the next big thing - CNN
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Mariners' vibes turn ugly after sweep: 'Nobody feels sorry for us' - The Seattle Times
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is your review of Hartley`s High School, Kolkata?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
D.C. Defenders win UFL title, 58-34 - NBC Sports
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do many Hong Kong Chinese look different from the Han Chinese in mainland China?